My Exchange on Emily Oster's "ParentData" Where She Recently Discussed Vaccines for Babies & Toddlers to her Audience of Concerned Parents. But She's not a Doctor...She's an Economist. (Part 1).
Emily Oster's "ParentData" blog is soft-selling vaccines on scared, trusting parents seeking guidance. Unfortunately Oster's Substack is anything but objective. Here is my exchange on that site.
“Under 5 Vaccines: FDA Decides, I dig into the data: Hot off the presses”
by Emily Oster, June 15, 2022.
Emily Oster’s Article Opens with this:
“Today the FDA met to discuss emergency use authorization for two vaccines for children six months to 5 years old. They voted this afternoon to approve the vaccines (the vote was 21 to 0 in favor for both vaccines). I will not go through all of the meeting details here, although you can read more here in a great “live blog” of the meeting. The meeting held relatively few surprises — they reviewed the data, heard from stakeholders, asked some questions and voted…”
Reading this article I was immediately suspicious, so I “dug into the data” of not only Pfizer and the approval hearing, but of Emily Oster’s article and sources. Here’s the comment I posted in the article’s forum:
“442 children have (reportedly) died from Covid. Not each year, but through the entire pandemic, c March 2020. That's .002% of the 19+million children 5 and under in this country. Though tragic, I am not sure why this is an "emergency" requiring EUA? However, 3,960 kids die from unintentional drowning annually. Shouldn't we be banning pools, beaches and bathtubs? https://www.cdc.gov/drowning/facts/index.html No...cause there's no money in that. No, instead it it seems like the bigger the emergency, the bigger the paycheck, the greater the corruption.
It's also interesting that kids 5 and under make up 6% of the US population (according to the last Census, 2021). Why is that interesting? Because Pfizer announced in mid-February that they had increased their forecasted revenue for 2022 from $98 billion to $102 billion, a 4% difference. But the estimated revenue increase from the Covid Vaccines went up to $1 Billion. Assuming you vaccinate 100% of the kids in this age group at the price of approximately $19.50 per shot x 3 (because Pfizer said they will need 3), then guess what you come out with? $1.17 Billion in revenue. But I am sure it's just a coincidence, Pfizer wouldn't inject little kids and babies with an experimental mRNA shot just to keep revenue promises to shareholders...would they?
Ahh, but then you might say "Well , surely if the 'vaccine' was dangerous it would not have made it past the object FDA drug approval committee, would it?" Well of course it would make it past these Pfizer owned bureaucrats at FDA, because reportedly 75% of the FDA's Drug Review Budget comes from the Pharmaceutical industry, according to a 2018 article in Forbes. (Forbes: https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnlamattina/2018/06/28/the-biopharmaceutical-industry-provides-75-of-the-fdas-drug-review-budget-is-this-a-problem/?sh=3efda2ac49ec).
You may ask ‘Why isn't the news reporting this?’ Why indeed. That answer is simple: Because most of the news you read, watch or listen to is ‘Brought to you by Pfizer’:
You might convince yourself that they are ‘safe and effective’ (the line that has been beat into your brain like a simple rhythm). If that's true, then why did the FDA, not Pfizer, block the 55k pages of their 3 trial from the public? In fact, FDA, per Pfizer's demands, put a 75 year embargo on the adverse events reporting. You'd be a fool and a really crappy parent if you did not at least ask ‘why?’ or try to get answers to these questions before letting your kids get injected. I never ask people to trust me or to ‘take my word for it,’ so here is the link for a repository of all court documents related to that case. https://phmpt.org/court-documents/.
You may even say, ‘Oh! I've heard about those documents...the fact checkers debunked what people said they found.’ Um....ok...if you want to trust a former barista turned medical document / scientific documentation Subject Matter Expert, be my guest. Or better, see for yourself. https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/. If you don't want get some orientation, please check out my wife and her team's reporting on what they've found in the documents. https://dailyclout.io/breaking-58-babies-who-received-mrna-covid-19-vaccines-suffered-life-threatening-adverse-events/
Feel free to fact check her, you have the same docs this team is using .
What you do is your business. No offense to Ms. Oster, but she, like me, is not a medical professional. Trust your own brains to do the research and analysis, then check your findings against people in the medical or research science related fields that you trust. I am fairly certain that by the end of the summer the death rate from vaccine related adverse events will far outweigh the reported 442 total deaths from SARS-CoV-2 for this age group. Your kids, just like my own little boy, look up to us and trust us to do the hard work to keep them safe. So do the hard work and do the research...not by reading blogs, twitter, or legacy news. I mean REAL research based on primary sources and empirical studies that show the numbers and the citations.
We are their defense against harm...so do the best for them (the children)...do the work and do the research. I HAVE done this research and my child will not be getting any of these shots! I believe they are just too dangerous and too untested. And btw, Covid (let's just admit it), is no emergency.”
Posted by Brian O’Shea SPI Writes Investigate Everything Jun 16 on
“ParentData” article comments section for article “Under 5 Vaccines: FDA Decides, I dig into the data” by Emily Oster, Economist.
(…too be continued).